Questions & Answers
This section contains Questions & Answers raised during SimRisk Challenge Competition.
You can subscribe to an RSS feed for the Questions and Answers page here. Feeds work by syndicating our content to your web browser or feed reader. You can find out more about RSS feeds here. If you do not have an RSS Feed reader, one can be obtained here:
09/10/09
|
From team: Royal Canucks |
||||
|
|
Can we get more information on what the values in the CA collections strategy table ie (RadS0, RadS1 etc) actually translate into in term of actions like in the tables for CC and PL?
|
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
In the CA Collections Strategy Table, the values "RadCS0", "RadCS1", "RadCS2" ... etc are simply system fields to flag which "Radio Button" has been selected. For example, in the "Very Soft" CA Collections strategy, the 2nd Radio Button is selected, so 'CS0' is set to "N", 'CS1' is "Y", and 'CS2'-CS5' are "N" |
|||
|
|
||||
07/10/09
|
From team: KBC BG |
||||
|
|
What does “Simulation Data” mean ?
|
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
During the webinars, teams can use 'Simulation' in SDS to analyse the performance of each "node" of each tree. The performance measures that are displayed are the same as those shown in the "Tools" section of the Launch Presentation. This allows teams to find out which parts of their strategy is performing well (ie making more profit this month than last month) and which parts are performing badly. For the 2nd webinar, the data will reflect the position at Month 39; in the 1st webinar, data was only available at Month 36. For example, if a team sees in performance reports that profit is reducing, SDS Simulation (in the webinar) will pick out which parts of each tree is causing the biggest reduction. The data that is available in Simulation is the same as that used to produce the portfolio reports. |
|||
|
|
||||
07/10/09
|
From team: KBC BG |
||||
|
|
Please also explain what does mean - “The auditors were quite surprised at the small number of teams that implemented Champion/Challenger strategies”
|
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
The most effective way for a team to find out whether one strategy change (eg Collections strategy or Limit strategy etc) is better than another is to implement a "Champion/Challenger trial", putting half the accounts through each strategy, and then 3 months later, monitoring which one produced a better result. The Auditors found that only a few teams had actually used this method. |
|||
|
|
||||
30/09/09
|
From team: WE CAM |
||||
|
|
Could you explain the split CC Utiln 80,100,120? And also could you explain the status Declined and Never Accepted in the characteristic "Account Status"? |
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
This split uses the characteristic "06CC PV.Balance to Limit pct", which represents the Current Credit Card Balance as a percentage of the Current Credit Card Credit Limit (the "utililsation" or "takeup" of the Credit Card Account). Accounts in the first interval ('lo - 80') have a Balance that is less than 80% of the Credit Limit (for example, Credit Limit £2000, Balance £1500) All customers on the Database have a Current Account, and some customers may choose to apply for a Credit Card and/or Personal Loan. If a customer Applied for a Credit Card, but the Originations strategy declined the application, the Account Status for Credit Card would be set to "X". He/she still has a Current Account, so the Customer's record still appears on the Database. In this situation, there will appear a cost (in '08CC PD.Account Opening Costs') for processing the application. For Current Account Customers who do NOT apply for a Credit Card, the field "08CC PD.Account Status" is set to "Z" (Never Applied) [not "Never Accepted"] |
|||
|
|
||||
28/09/09
|
From team: Leo |
||||
|
|
When there is an increase in customer complaints, what financial driver does this impact? |
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Customer Service Costs; each complaint costs £5. |
|||
|
|
||||
22/09/09
|
From team: Royal Canucks |
||||
|
|
At the webinar will we be looking at tweaking the existing strategies or working on brand new strategies from scratch? |
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
It is totally up to each team whether they want to build on what is in place already, or start afresh with a brand new strategy. |
|||
|
|
||||
22/09/09
|
From team: Royal Canucks |
||||
|
|
Is any actual data being distributed to help with the strategy development ? |
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
After each webinar phase, the data will be updated based on the impact of the strategy that has been in place. This data will be available on the driver’s PC at the next webinar. NOTE : In preparation for the 1st webinar, teams can use the screen-prints from the Launch presentation to identify potential strategy problems & opportunities.
|
|||
|
|
||||
22/09/09
|
From team: Palma |
||||
|
|
What time period does each webinar cover? |
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
22/09/09
|
From team: Royal Canucks |
||||
|
|
Can you explain the weighting? |
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
22/09/09
|
From team:The Blue Box |
||||
|
|
Can credit cards and personal loans be sold to existing current account holders? Can prospects apply for credit cards or personal loans? |
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Yes.
|
|||
|
|
||||
18/09/09
|
From team: New Economy |
||||
|
|
Is a monthly customer management score predicting risk of default available? |
|||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Yes, a behavioural score is available for Credit Cards, Personal Loans and Current Accounts, as well as an overall Customer-Level score. However, teams will draw their own opinions on the effectiveness of each, (during the webinars with their Drivers.)The scores will not be effective at predicting risk if the strategies have been inappropriate. |
|||
|
|
||||



From t
From t
From t
From t
From t
From t
From t